Will's World header

Too Eager to Please

By Will Manley

Wed, 03/13/2013 - 11:53

Librarians must learn how to say no

Art by Richard Lee.

“I think I’ve found a department to trim to help with next year’s city budget deficit.” Art by Richard Lee.




Printer-friendly versionPrint

Pity the poor library director, whose job description includes ensuring the work gets done, the patrons are happy, the powers that be (trustees, city managers, regents, deans, principals, school board members, city council members, county commissioners, etc.) are also happy, and library employees are happy. Oh, I forgot one thing: Do all this with a 10% budget cut.

We often talk about the librarian image, and this conversation often morphs into a debate about the dreaded librarian stereotype. We all know where that leads: We need to get a new wardrobe, we need to lose the comfy shoes, we need to update the 19th-century hairdo, we need to go on a diet, and most of all, we need to chill.

Personally, I think that’s bad advice. Our dumpy, frumpy, lumpy, homely, mousy, dour image may not be exactly appealing, but it’s also benign, serious, and sincere—which trumps a lot of other professional stereotypes, such as those of bankers (loan sharks), lawyers (barracudas), politicians (liars), stock brokers (con artists), and physicians (quacks).

There is, however, one thing I would like to change about librarians. I’m fine with sensible shoes, frumpy frocks, and boring bunheads, but let’s stop pretending we can move mountains and perform miracles. We are, quite frankly, too eager to please. It seems to be ingrained in our professional DNA. We just can’t say no.

What did we say to one of the best-funded and most powerful of all federal agencies, the IRS? “Oh, you can’t afford to set up or staff your own tax form distribution centers? Don’t worry, we’ll rescue you. Our library is a central gathering place, and we have a staff full of reference librarians willing to explain the intricacies of the US tax code to anyone who stumbles in and doesn’t know a capital gain from an itemized deduction. We live to serve.”

The US Postal Service has apparently learned from its IRS brethren. After going billions of dollars into debt and being almost aced out of business by the double whammy of email and private-sector carriers that actually deliver your letters and packages on time and in good condition, the USPS is finally thinking outside of the post office box: The agency has hatched the concept of putting post office kiosks in libraries. It can’t be that much different than readers’ advisory work, can it? It’s called leveraging staff or pooling resources. Here’s how it works. Library staffers who have had their hours cut and their salaries slashed are asked to take on yet one more service.

Yes, it’s important to forge community partnerships. But can you think of two more undesirable partners than the IRS and the USPS?

Even worse than partnering with unpopular government agencies are library directors who kowtow when city managers and mayors insist that libraries slash their budget by 10% without cutting services. At what point will we realize that those who care most about serving the public should respond with a firm “no” rather than a wimpy “yes”?

WILL MANLEY has furnished provocative commentary on librarianship for more than 30 years and has written nine books on the lighter side of library science. Contact him at wmanley[at]att.net.

Comments

Yes yes yes

Yes, it is time libraries and librarians stop agreeing to do more with less. It is time we made politicians and local governments appreciate that what we do comes at a cost and that to cut hours is a reasonable response to clipped budgets.

USPS

A GOP-led Congress ruled that the USPS must account for 75 years of retirement benefits - thus the huge debts. NO OTHER FEDERAL AGENCY HAS TO DO THIS. The plan is to bankrupt the USPS and then have it privatized. So although I have no wish to handle the mail as well as taxes, the USPS is perhaps not the best example here - it’s about as powerless as libraries, and it will be missed if it is privatized and rates skyrocket, especially to small and out of the way places.

Also in agreement

I’m also in agreement with Joneser. Even if one doesn’t attribute all of the USPS’s financial woes to the pension funding requirement, it’s far too reductive (even for a short column) to cast the USPS as a dinosaur succumbing to the private-sector mammals.

Also, unlike the the tax form program, the postal service’s Village Post Office program is not an unfunded mandate: a library signing on would get funding. Whether or not it would be worth it of course depends on the library and community, but while I agree that librarians should learn to say “no” a little more often, they shouldn’t do so automatically.

I’ve written more about this on my blog: http://galencharlton.com/blog/2013/03/return-to-sender/.

Yes, I agree with all you’ve

Yes, I agree with all you’ve said about librarians being too agreeable. But the point that Joneser is making here is important, correct & needs to be acknowledged.

You Have to See The Big Picture

I have to agree. I think that the larger point that Manley is trying to make (and perhaps readers got caught up in the USPS example, which I can see as being reductive) is that as a changing and developing profession, we’ve also become the “if no one else is taking care of it, we’ll take care of it” building. There’s a fine line between evolving to suit the needs of our communities and picking up the slack from other agencies. We have a crumbling mental health system, a huge population who are unemployed — so where do these people go? To us, and we provide them with (in my opinion) superb care and as much help as we can give. At some point we need to say no.

Trying to be everything for everybody library

I agree Katy. The loss of the safety net in this country had unfairly burdened public libraries with social problems.

You would not believe what library users ask for! This last Saturday, a patron asked for a ice pack because he had been in fight and his head hurt. We asked him if he needed the paramedics. He said he had already seen a doctor.
We asked if he needed to know the location of a walk-in clinic. He didn’t.
Now, you have to understand that we see 1500-2000 people a day in this library. Our security guard has been specifically instructed by his company not to do any first aid.

I assume this person was homeless and had nowhere else to go. I feel the cities are using the public libraries as day shelters, because they don’t want to deal with the problem.

Anyway, I said no. Really, what do I stop doing, so I could attend the public’s medical & social needs?

I actually felt quilty, but enough is enough. I have many more examples!