Inside Scoop header

Exclusive Interview with FakeAACR2

Screenshot of FakeAACR2

Screenshot of FakeAACR2



Printer-friendly versionPrint

With the reverberation of a couple dozen subfield delimiters echoing through the Twitterverse, @FakeAACR2 announced her presence. “Sorry. Dropped my fat self on the keyboard,” she apologized. A sizable handful of followers quickly accepted her apology, and thus Alexandra Beaton, the University of North Carolina SLIS student masquerading as the phony cataloging standard, created some buzz last week as librarianship’s answer to internet sensation FakeAPStyleBook. We caught up with FakeAACR2 via email for this exclusive interview:

American Libraries: Why Fake AACR2?

FakeAACR2: Catalogers are pimps, too. FakeAPStylebook, FakeMTA, and other Twitter accounts of that nature are so popular, I wanted in on some of that action. Besides, it seems the library Twittersphere enjoys a chuckle, so I’m glad I can provide it.

Those of us who haven’t cracked open the AACR2 since library school are feeling kind of left out here. What makes diacritical marks and single statements of responsibility so funny?

It’s all about bling, name-dropping, and of course, relevant and organized description of materials.

How far do you plan to take this?

As long as rules can be cleverly manipulated, there will be a FakeAACR2. Some days or weeks might not be as prolific, but as long as followers are laughing, FakeAACR2 will be around.

I can’t help but notice your profile pic isn’t too friendly toward RDA. Why the hate?

It’s more of a playful rivalry. In my head, it’s a lot like the East Coast-West Coast hip-hop rivalry. That, and the image came about in under a minute during a break in a cataloging class.

RDA has set out to make cataloging more effective for a wider variety of media and in an online environment. What’s your approach?

The AACR2 goes well beyond the realm of cataloging in ways RDA never could. For example, I can hold doors open when your arms are full. I act as a booster seat when a toddler shows up to dinner unannounced. And I’m big enough to actually keep you warm at night. But as far as accommodating more media and online access, I suppose there’s always room for more revisions and updates. I have room to grow—bigger is better.

Is Twitter the new Cataloger’s Desktop?

Definitely! # is the new ‡

 

 

Comments

I'm really glad he/she doesn't have a beef with Dublin Core.

I can’t wait for the twit behind FakeAACR2 to get out of the cataloging class and into an actual cataloging job. OPACs that can’t display or index certain fields, local vs. LCSH subject headings, tweaking the GMD for display purposes, etc.

ouch

That’s harsh. FakeAACR2 is all just for fun, of course. Where’s the love, WEMIphilia?

It’s been my policy so far to approve any comment that’s not spam, but you’re publically calling one of your professional colleagues-to-be a twit, and that makes me rethink my open-comment policy. Please consider posing your comment more politely.

RDA is a stupid name for a set of rules

The biggest problem with RDA is the name:  Resource Description and Access.  Not only is the acronym RDA already in use (Recommended Daily Allowance) but AACR was a much better description of what it actually was: Anglo-American Cataloging RULES.  The JSC should rename it RRDA (Rules for Resource Description and Access) or just stick with what works:  AACR3.

ALL the good TLAs are taken

  1. 1: It’s "The School of Information and Library Science", or "SILS".  The author is getting confused with those dyslexicographers at  the GSLIS at UIUC (which, of course, is located  in  Champaign-Urbana).
  2. 2: http://www.acronymfinder.com/RDA.html lists 48 verified meanings. When I first encountered it, was that it was short for "Really the Damn AACR3".
  3. 3: F is to FRBR as  S is to SOAP.
  4. Coincience?
    • AACR2.  Main sourec of Anglo-American Cataloging rules.
    • AAC - Leading manufacturer of surpressors (shushers in bibliospeak).
    • R2 - Major consultant on economics of cataloging.