Emphasis on Ebooks Stirs Community Outcry in Illinois


At you library logo

I love libraries ad

 

Advertise on our site


Printer-friendly versionPrint

By Sanhita SinhaRoy

Area residents served by the Rockford (Ill.) Public Library are questioning a decision by the board of trustees to allocate 25.5% toward the purchase of ebooks for the year. That amount would equal $303,332 of the library’s $1.19 million total collection budget for FY2012.

Protesters, who included the local chapter of the NAACP, held a news conference at the main library on January 13 to voice their opposition, stating that the increasing shift toward digital media will leave behind traditional users and those without money or access to new technology.

Members of the community-based initiative Save Our Library (SOL) noted that a proposal in RPL’s draft August 2011 “Facilities and Digital Library Plan” recommended that the library strive for a 95/5 ratio of digital-to-print. “The library would only purchase print in the event that no digital version is available for a needed item,” the proposal states. Frank Novak, executive director of the library, said in the January 14 Rockford Register Star that the relevant memos and reports from him to trustees were never voted on and had not been made public until the January 13 news conference. “Those are things that I’ve looked at for the long term,” he told the Star, “what could happen in the long run.”

There’s always an emotional response to library changes,” Community Relations Officer Emily Hartzog told AL. “It’s kind of a compliment, because it shows that the community is passionate about the library and values it.” She went on to say that the library does not intend to abandon print books but rather to add more DVDs, CDs, audiobooks, and downloadable material. “It’s not a loss; it’s an addition to,” said Hartzog.

SOL member Rachel Leon told AL that the speed with which the library board appears to be instituting these changes “doesn’t make sense for the socioeconomic realities of our community.” According to the 2010 Census, 22% of Rockford’s nearly 153,000 residents are in poverty. Of the 102 US libraries that serve similarly sized communities and that reported to the latest Public Library Data Service’s Statistical Report, average ebook expenditures were $7,413. The largest amount was $71,992, appropriated for High Point (N.C.) Public Library.

Any more the library board does to make access to books either more complicated, more cumbersome, or costly does not seem like it would be a good fit,” another SOL member, Margie Veitch, told WTVO in Rockford January 12.

The minutes of an October 24, 2011, trustees meeting indicate that board President Paul Logli said the library is merely going where the public has already taken it, citing the growth of ebook checkouts. He added that while there may ultimately be fewer print materials available, it behooves the board to try to anticipate library users’ needs.

Hartzog explained to AL that the RPL board used several factors to determine the budget, including figures that show ebook circulation shot up 52% between 2009 and 2010. From 2010 to 2011, the increase skyrocketed 92%. By comparison, print circulation peaked at 2009 and has dropped 25% since then, she said.

But Leon told AL that the circulation numbers are skewed because, since 2009, the board has been cutting library hours and has tried to close two of its six locations. “They’ve been looking for a way to justify more cuts to hours and closing libraries,” she asserted.

RPL’s overall FY2012 budget for electronic resources constitutes 35% of the acquisitions budget. Explaining that figures were not broken out for ebook spending in previous fiscal years, Hartzog added that it was impossible to compare the library’s FY2012 budget for ebooks and previous years’ ebook spending for Rockford Public Library.

RPL hopes to make 50 Kindle e-readers available for checkout by spring, and Hartzog said the plan to circulate e-readers was always part of the discussion when the board was determining how to allocate the collection budget.

Jane Pearlmutter, associate director emerita at the School of Library and Information Studies at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, who teaches in the area of collection management and electronic resources, told AL that unless a library pays for many simultaneous users, it’s possible that a patron could reach the top of the hold list for an e-reader while still waiting for the desired ebook, or vice versa.

Pearlmutter also noted that libraries that move to a primarily ebook collection may find that they pay over and over for access to the same titles: “RPL seems like a passenger who knows it is time to go somewhere but is standing on the wrong platform, waiting for the wrong train.”

The next meeting of the Rockford library trustees is scheduled for January 23.

American Libraries, Wed, 01/18/2012 - 11:46

Comments

The first sale doctrine

The first sale doctrine should also apply to digital books and this should be made law. Not doing so erodes the meaning of a library service, and basically puts the library budget under huge, ever changing pressure. This puts the future of information provision in the hands of private businesses, which is not something anyone could possibly want to happen.

Maybe the citizens would like

Maybe the citizens would like to be reminded (or told) that those ebooks are not truthfully owned; they are rented, just like most other ebooks in libraries. Like it or not, those ebooks come with strings if a library is the intended recipient (one can hardly say ‘owner’).

Food for thought.

As a Rockford Public Library

As a Rockford Public Library user, I say THANKS for the increase in digital books. I noticed the difference and have found titles I have enjoyed reading. Since I bought my Nook Tablet, I have read more in the last month (digitally) than in the last year (physical books). It is easy and convenient (unlike making a special trip to the library since they moved the East Branch away from where I live). You can’t check out the digital copies as long as a print copy and you are limited to 5 at a time, but that hasn’t been a problem. I applaude them for the increase. I love the physical book (especially when it’s new) but the convenience of the digital copy is great! I don’t know what the right percentage of digital to print copies should be, but I am happy with the changes that have been made so far.

I’d like to see the actual

I’d like to see the actual numbers for e-book circulation, not the percentage increases. The % increase can be very deceptive if you have a smaller collection. If you have 10 e-books in your collection and one year they each get checked out once, and the next year they each get checked out 3 times, you can go to the board and crow that your e-book circulation shot up by 200% in one year. it would be true, but would not reflect the reality of 10 checkouts vs 30 checkouts.

YOU get with it

Anonymous doesn’t appear to know about the millions of people who don’t have the latest technology, who can’t afford Internet access at their homes (if they have one …) any longer, or aren’t going to be buying a new computer if theirs breaks down. The digital divide - like the income divide - is alive and “well” and getting wider by the minute.

Libraries are NOT Amazon, thank God. Amazon has a MUCH bigger physical/collector mode and thinks it has to offer all things to all people, and at a price (of course!)

Dear Anonymous. The library

Dear Anonymous. The library provides free Internet service and public access computers to library card holders. It will also provide access to eReaders for patrons who can’t afford one of their own. The library strives to bridge the digital divide. It is important to learn how to use this technology or be left behind. The library is the perfect place to introduce and provide eBooks.

The library DOES NOT allow

The library DOES NOT allow people to download ebooks in the library from Overdrive - it is too big of a drag on their bandwidth, and I don’t see this changing any time soon.

E-book publishers (Random

E-book publishers (Random House excluded) have made it apparent that they are unwilling to provide content to libraries. Why bother supporting a service that doesn’t support libraries?

I agree why is no one even

I agree why is no one even addressing the factthatmore and more publishers are pulling out of library lending?is the even enough materials purchasable with that budget?

People who have e-readers can

People who have e-readers can afford to buy titles to put on them. I don’t have one (can’t afford it); no cell phone (can’t afford it); put the money to cable internet instead because NOTHING could be done on dial-up anymore. As a librarian, I believe strongly that a book in hand beats a vitrual book every time.

Rockford

Well, FINALLY a library board that is with it! Time for libraries and libraries to get in the real world. With e-book readers and tablets proliferating, is it unreasonable for the Rockford library to allocate so much of its budget to resources in e-format? Now, perhaps it will take a look at weather physical plants to the extent in which they currently exist are necessary. Same goes for library staff. It should take a clue from Amazon: does an enterprise need a large physical plant in order to do and stay in business. And, does it need to be in the collector mode and try to offer all things to all people? Or, should it stick with what it does well.

Wake up librarians: the times they are a’changin’, and you need to get with it!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.