Madison’s Mayor Joins Librarians’ Labor-Rights Rally


At you library logo

I love libraries ad

ALA Store ad

Advertise on our site

Madison Mayor Dave Cieslewicz (center in baseball cap) rallies with Wisconsin li

Madison Mayor Dave Cieslewicz (center in baseball cap) rallies with Wisconsin librarians.


Printer-friendly versionPrint

By Sharon McQueen

Mayor Dave Cieslewicz joined Wisconsin’s librarians March 6 as they again assembled to march to the State Capitol in opposition to Governor Scott Walker’s Budget Repair Bill (PDF file), whose passage would dramatically curtail collective bargaining rights for public-sector employees.

I was proud to join librarians to march to the Capitol and fight Scott Walker’s divisive policies,” Cieslewicz remarked March 8. “Librarians, like our teachers, police officers, and fire fighters make incredibly important contributions to our community. And in Madison, we know how to work together with our workers and solve our problems together.”

Cieslewicz also objects to Gov. Walker’s proposed state budget for the 2011–2013 biennium, which was released on March 1. According to the March 3 issue of the Channel Weekly, published by the Wisconsin Division for Libraries, Technology, and Community Learning, proposed cuts to library system aid would be decreased by 10% for 2012 with funding remaining flat for 2013. Similar cuts are proposed for BadgerLink, an online information resource for Wisconsin residents, and NFB-Newsline, a free dial-in service that provides access to more than 50 newspapers to those Wisconsin residents who for any physical reason cannot read normal print. The newspapers, including the Wisconsin State Journal and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, are made available through the use of computerized speech.

In addition, the Executive Budget proposes elimination of the “maintenance of effort” currently required by Wisconsin Statute 43.15 (4)(c), which is designed to prevent sudden and drastic cuts to library budgets:

The Governor recommends eliminating the requirement that municipalities and counties maintain annual local expenditures for public libraries at the average of the prior three years as a condition for being a member of a public library system.

The Wisconsin Library Association (WLA) opposes the proposed Budget Repair Bill and affirms the collective bargaining rights of public employees. On February 28, the WLA Board voted unanimously to endorse ALA’s Statement in Support of Worker’s Rights to Collectively Bargain and drafted its own. In his February 1 State of the State Address, Gov. Walker reminded Wisconsin’s citizens of the state’s tradition of frugality, as is mentioned in the Wisconsin Constitution. In an online statement, WLA President-elect Ron McCabe commented on another Wisconsin tradition—fairness:

The Budget Repair Bill is certainly frugal, but it is also certainly unfair. The bill has been promoted as a means of making the compensation of public employees fair when compared with the private sector. Librarians will be glad to direct legislators to the many studies which prove that public employee compensation including pensions and health insurance is below compensation for comparable private sector jobs, both nationally and in Wisconsin. Inaccurately portraying public employees as being overpaid is unfair. It is also unfair to include sweeping policy changes in the areas of collective bargaining rights, Medicaid eligibility, and the sale of public assets in an emergency bill designed to strictly limit debate on these important issues.

The Wisconsin Library Association supports the Wisconsin traditions of frugality and fairness. We are proud to stand with those who oppose this unfair legislation.

In testimony McCabe gave February 15 to the Joint Committee on Finance, he said, in part:

Like other public organizations, public school, technical college, university, and community libraries are only as good as the people we can recruit and retain to work in these institutions. We recruit nationally for professional staff. Any long-term policy to reduce and suppress public employee compensation, like the bill before you, damages our ability to staff these important institutions with those capable of providing high-quality educational services.

The faculty and staff of the University of Wisconsin–Madison’s School of Library and Information Studies have also publicly opposed “the abolition of most collective bargaining rights by the Budget Repair Bill.” In a letter to the governor and legislature, published in the student newspaper The Badger Herald, they wrote, “We believe this will grievously harm the University of Wisconsin, its undergraduates, graduate students, employees, and, not least, all of the people of the state,” concluding:

We stand in solidarity with our sister universities throughout the state, and with the teachers, teaching assistants, office workers, and many others who clear our roads, guard our prisons, keep us safe, and educate our children. We want a Wisconsin that looks forward, toward a bright future in a 21st-century economy. And we also want a civil Wisconsin, where critical decisions concerning hundreds of thousands of citizens aren’t made overnight by fiat. We have real problems in our state; to solve them, we must sit down together. We call on the governor and the legislature to take a step back, to listen to all of the state’s citizens, and to work together to build a common future.

The crowd of more than 60 library protesters, easily double that of the previous week’s rally, eagerly cleared space for Mayor Cieslewicz who was asked to say a few words. He spoke briefly of his support for libraries and library workers and specifically of his support for the upcoming renovation of the Madison Public Library’s Central Library building, and announced that he would be marching with the librarians to the State Capitol—news that library supporters greeted with applause and cheers.

Those also marching included pediatrician and librarian Dipesh Navsaria, who was also there to oppose Gov. Walker’s proposed cuts to health care; Christine Pawley, director and professor of UW–Madison’s School of Library and Information Studies; Karen Zweizig, former director of the Janesville Public Library; Charles Read, dean emeritus of UW–Madison’s School of Education; Sarah Farrer Bukrey of the Stoughton Public Library; Jaime Vache of the Madison Public Library; and James P. Danky, coeditor of the series Alternative Library Literature.

The library professionals were joined by a number of library supporters, including patron Judy Skog, who proudly proclaimed, “I love my library!” and plastic palm tree–carrying John Kamerling who said, “I’m here because I hate injustice and I’m proud to march with the librarians.” The palm trees, which have become a popular demonstration prop in Madison, are a visual reference to a February 28 O’Reilly Factor broadcast during which footage of a combative protest incident in Sacramento, California—with palm trees clearly visible in the background—was shown during discussion of events taking place in Madison. The following day, the Madison Capitol Square was covered in plastic blow-up palm trees.

Enthusiasm appears to be building for another librarians’ protest, scheduled to begin at 11:30 a.m. Central time March 12 outside the Madison Public Library’s Central Library.

SHARON McQUEEN is a doctoral candidate in the University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Library and Information Studies.

American Libraries, Tue, 03/08/2011 - 18:14

Comments

LIBRARIANSHIP

I have always appreciated that ALA advocates for better pay for all librarians and library staff. I have long worked to see librarians and library staff respected. As each of us inspires young people to take on the work of this noble profession we hope for better salaries and benefits to support their future. If we want to attract our brilliant young minds to contribute the future of librarianship we must work to provide salaries and benefits that are rewarding. I wish more of the super wealthy would support libraries rather than attack ads. I wish a better future for all.

bright future - you bet

Now that you will be free of your union overlords - the prospect for the future of libraries looks brighter and brighter. You can take those dead dues dollars you used to be forced to hand over to union - and invest in a 401k, 457, Roth IRA and have a stake in the future growth of America !

Madison Libraries are Madison Issue

The mayor of Madison proudly says “And in Madison, we know how to work together with our workers and solve our problems together.” Then why are they involved with state funding or state relationships to unions? Why are the library employees members of a union at all, if the Madison government can work together with them to solve their problems?

In Wisconsin, if you want to work as a public employee, you are forced to join and pay into a union, and then have your dues money given in political contributions to Democratic Party politicians, whether you support Democrats or not. Unions that have the power to force membership should be broken. And what makes collective bargaining a right? There is a difference between a right and a privilege.

The Democratic legislators who ran away because they could not get their way knew a vote was coming; they have had ample opportunity to stay on the job and fight for what their constituents want. They chose to hide from the fact that they might lose, and took any chance of compromise on the bill with them.

And the ALA should be politically neutral. Instead, the organization’s Leftist bias is clear, and that is why many librarians do not join.

Please do not assume that all

Please do not assume that all public librarians support this protest. Some of us feel the governor is following the rule of law and the protestors are behaving badly. The conflict of interest with public sector unions is a real problem, not the same situation as other unions. ALA should not assume its membership always falls on the liberal side and should stay away from political positions such as this one.

voice of reason

Bravo to this comment - ALA should try to be more objective on political issues; Where are the articles that present a detailed examination of the pro/cons of the Governor’s bill ? Instead all we get is vitriol from union hacks . I have no problem if the American Library Association-Allied Professional Association engages in this stuff - but the parent organization should be more balanced.

If ALA Cannot Represent Librarians on This Issue Then When?

Anonymous would like ALA to be more objective on political issues. I would agree with the assertion that seeing analysis of the pros and cons of the bill would be useful, and I dare say that people in the profession could possibly provide such an analysis. That would certainly be more useful than “vitriol from union hacks”, or the corresponding vitriol from those such as Texas2Step who find unions offensive.

However, this issue is not some tangential windmill-tilt, but an issue that clearly affects the jobs of library professionals at all levels. Whether you regard collective bargaining as a privilege or a right (and I—not pro-union by any stretch—consider it the former), the fact is that the public worker unions did have this as a means of protecting their professional well-being. Importantly, this privilege helped level the playing field for their rights, as most states have ethics laws that prohibit them from personally and actively advocating on their own behalf. Without the union—and without ALA for that matter—it’s the same as saying a public worker has LESS of a voice than the people they serve. Are we comfortable with the idea that our neighbors, our friends, our peers, our colleagues, are effectively feudal serfs now?

So I ask, if ALA were not to stand up and make a statement for THIS issue, then when could they reasonably expect to stand up for the profession otherwise? If they were not speak to protect the professional status and well-being of the public workers in the profession, could they reasonably speak up when it comes to the rest of us who aren’t affected now but could be later? The answer is no. They couldn’t, not if they wanted to retain the respect of those of us that want them to be our voice.

well said

Regarding Ted’s comments - well said but perhaps a bit misguided. ALA as an institution could just as easily link furthering the profession with fiscal restraint. For instance if all state local and federal libraries tried to balance the need to offer world class service with the idea of not being overly burdensome on the taxpayers - then ALA might well see that the Governors bill will prevent a fiscal catastrophe that could ultimately lead to less libraries and librarians. Furthermore ALA also represent Trustee’s and Administrators who might also be more welcoming of the Governors legislation.

It was all about the unions, not saving money

For those who voted for Gov. Walker and Republicans this last election: distinctly un-democratic proceedings that make a mockery of representative government: is this what you had in mind? And finally the true goal of all this becomes clear: the coup yesterday was possible because they said they voted on a *non-fiscal issue.* So, as we all knew, it was never about the budget, it was about breaking unions. Hope that Madison & Wisconsin follow the way of Cairo…

unions and the people

Wisconsin why are you sitting on your hands waiting for while your Governor is giving tax breaks to millionaires and taking away from your childrens Education? Oh I forgot wealthy kids go to privates schools and know Republicans want you to give money to there schools with tax breaks also.
Mean while Wisconsin the people there are the largest losers not wall street. They bought your Governor for pennies on the dollar. While they will come into your state distroy it by distroying your wages cheap workers in low income housing why not . Yes Wisconsin I now that you have pride in your State that will end up being one of the poorest states in income if you don’t stand up. God Bless you all. I will pray for those that knowingly are distroying your state for greed.

Grammar and spelling?

While I understand you, it might be taken more seriously if you spelled words correctly and had decent grammar.

Tax Breaks for Millionaires?

The wealthy of this nation, at both the state and national levels, pay almost all the taxes the governments collect. They start and own the businesses that employ millions. Unless they are criminals, they haven’t taken anything from you or me to become wealthy. They have done more to create more wealth for more people than you or I ever will, and far more than the governments ever will. And their charitable contributions help more than the governments can or will.

That dishonest line about “tax breaks for the wealthy” is getting tired. There is nothing just about making people pay a higher percentage because they make more money. If they made it honestly, they are entitled to the fruits of their labor. There are wealthy Democrats and wealthy Republicans. The villification of wealthy people by Democrats is simply a means of sparking class envy, so that they can pretend to be on the side of the “little guy,” and gain all those votes. Don’t fall for it.

They pay the most taxes

They pay the most taxes because they have the most money. 400 wealthy Americans hold the same amount of money as 155 MILLION Americans (that’s half of all Americans).

As far as employing millions, you have to have people who can afford what you’re selling and want to buy what you’re selling before you can have a successful business. The millions of consumers are what keep businesses afloat and who contribute to the employment of millions.

Why should money made on investing (capital gains) be taxed at a lower rate (15%) than money earned by HARD WORK? Because the wealthy have paid politicians to juryrig the system in their favor. The wealthy get paved roads that enable their workers to get to the factory. They get a legal system in which to protect their patents and other assets. They get oil subsidies and agricultural subsidies which are not needed. They get military contracts for weapons and planes that the Pentagon doesn’t want but that Congress pushes through to keep the money flowing to the contractor.

So, the worker wants some rights to bargain with the only thing they have…their labor. And the reason you have to pay dues is, why should someone get to reap the benefits of labor negotiations (higher pay, better bennies) without supporting the organization getting those improvements for you?

I live in Texas, a Right to Work state. RTW states generally have lower wages than union states. Workers in the south (where most RTW states are) have sold their souls for a mess of pottage.

taxes X 4

Cindy

The reason capital gains should be “only” 15% is that each dollar invested - whether it be that of a prince or a pauper is already taxed at 4 and possibly 5 times. For example the investor earns the dollar and pays income tax, the company that accepts the dollar as an investment - is then taxed on the profit it generates from the dollar, the investor pays taxes on dividends, The investor pays capital gains on ant shares sold, and lastly the investor may pay inheritance tax if he dies while still holding that dollar of investment. that seem like plenty of taxes !

The investor doesn’t pay

The investor doesn’t pay estate taxes…he’s dead. His heirs pay it…on money that they didn’t do anything to earn.

As Abraham Lincoln said, “Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”

Keep what you earn

Lincoln would want you to keep more of what you earn !!!

UNION LIBRARY WORKERS

See more union news at ALA Connect UNION LIBRARY WORKERS COMMUNITY:
http://connect.ala.org/node/71716

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.