For Immediate Release
Tue, 09/21/2010 - 12:40
Contact: Anonymous
Public Information Office (PIO)
Nation confronts censorship head-on during Banned Books Week, Sept. 25 – Oct. 2
CHICAGO – What do books from the Twilight series, “To Kill a Mockingbird” and “Catcher in the Rye” have in common? All have faced removal from library bookshelves in the United States within the past year.
From coast to coast, libraries and bookstores will battle censorship and celebrate the freedom to read during Banned Books Week, Sept. 25 – Oct. 2, 2010. Thousands of participants will read from banned or challenged books and will discuss the impact censorship has on civil liberties.
Each year, the American Library Association’s (ALA) Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF) receives hundreds of reports on book challenges, which are formal written requests to remove a book from a library or classroom because of an objection to the book’s content. There were 460 recorded attempts to remove materials from libraries in 2009 and more than 11,000 attempts recorded since OIF began compiling information on book challenges in 1990.
“Not every book is right for each reader, but we should have the right to think for ourselves and allow others to do the same,” said ALA President Roberta Stevens. “The founders of this nation protected freedom of expression based on their conviction that a diversity of views and ideas is necessary for a vital, functioning democracy. Danger does not arise from viewpoints other than our own; the danger lies in allowing others to decide for us and our communities which reading materials are appropriate. How can we live in a free society and develop our own opinions if our right to choose reading materials for ourselves and our families is taken away? We must remain diligent and protect our freedom to read.”
In many cases, it is only through public concern and citizen involvement that books are saved from confiscation or from being kept under lock and key. For example in Stockton, Mo., concerned citizens spoke out during school board meetings and persuaded the school board to reconsider its ban of Sherman Alexie’s National Book Award –winning novel, “The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.” While the work of these citizens is not done, their ongoing campaign to encourage the Stockton school board to reverse its decision demonstrates how public support for the right to read freely can help prevent the suppression of literature and ideas.
This year will mark the 29th annual celebration of Banned Books Week. This year’s observance will kick off in Chicago on Sept. 25, as best-selling banned authors participate in a “Read Out!” event. Participating authors include the most frequently challenged author of 2009, Lauren Myracle (the ttyl, ttfn, l8r, g8r series); Chris Crutcher (“Athletic Shorts”) and many others.
Many bookstores and libraries celebrating Banned Books Week will showcase selections from the ALA OIF’s “Top Ten Most Frequently Challenged Books of 2009.” The list is released each spring and serves as a comprehensive snapshot of book removal attempts in the U.S. The “Top Ten Most Frequently Challenged Books of 2009” reflects a range of themes and consists of the following titles:
- ttyl, ttfn, l8r, g8r (series), by Lauren Myracle
Reasons: Drugs, Nudity, Offensive Language, Sexually Explicit, Unsuited to Age Group - “And Tango Makes Three,” by Peter Parnell and Justin Richardson
Reasons: Homosexuality - “The Perks of Being A Wallflower,” by Stephen Chbosky
Reasons: Anti-Family, Drugs, Homosexuality, Offensive Language, Religious Viewpoint, Sexually Explicit, Suicide, Unsuited to Age Group, - “To Kill A Mockingbird,” by Harper Lee
Reasons: Offensive Language, Racism, Unsuited to Age Group - Twilight (series) by Stephenie Meyer
Reasons: Religious Viewpoint, Sexually Explicit, Unsuited to Age Group - “Catcher in the Rye,” by J.D. Salinger
Reasons: Offensive Language, Sexually Explicit, Unsuited to Age Group - “My Sister’s Keeper,” by Jodi Picoult
Reasons: Drugs, Homosexuality, Offensive Language, Religious Viewpoint, Sexism, Sexually Explicit, Suicide, Unsuited to Age Group, Violence - “The Earth, My Butt, and Other Big, Round Things,” by Carolyn Mackler
Reasons: Offensive Language, Sexually Explicit, Unsuited to Age Group - “The Color Purple,” Alice Walker
Reasons: Offensive Language, Sexually Explicit, Unsuited to Age Group - “The Chocolate War,” by Robert Cormier
Reasons: Nudity, Offensive Language, Sexually Explicit, Unsuited to Age Group
For more information on Banned Books Week, book challenges and censorship, please visit the Office of Intellectual Freedom’s Banned Books Web site at www.ala.org/bbooks, or www.bannedbooksweek.org.
Banned Books Week is sponsored by the American Booksellers Association, the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression, the ALA, the Association of American Publishers, the American Society of Journalists and Authors, the National Association of College Stores and is endorsed by the Library of Congress Center for the Book.
-30-
Trending Now
Current Issue
Noted and Quoted

“Even though Spaulding’s name is not readily recognized, he was an American patriot who safeguarded the freedoms of US citizens by writing the Library Bill of Rights.”
Teresa Wood, describing Forrest Brisbane Spaulding, head of Des Moines (Iowa) Public Library from 1929 to 1952, as depicted in the play The Not So Quiet Librarian, “A Librarian to Remember,” Webster City (Iowa) Daily Freeman-Journal, Apr. 20.
American Libraries Magazine | 50 East Huron | Chicago, IL 60611 | 2012© American Library Association | Staff Login








Comments
WHY
harry potter and percy jaxon have banned in schools nationwide why wepons batteling amd as far as IM concerned JUST TO TICK PEPOLE OFF
ALA's Dishonesty Problem; No Book Banning for Half a Century
There’s been no book banning for about half a century. Will someone please explain why the ALA needs to mislead people when it could very well address this serious issue in an honest fashion?
Former ALA Councilor Jessamyn West said, "It also highlights the thing we know about Banned Books Week that we don’t talk about much — the bulk of these books are challenged by parents for being age-inappropriate for children. While I think this is still a formidable thing for librarians to deal with, it’s totally different from people trying to block a book from being sold at all." See "Banned Books Week is Next Week."
And then there’s Judith Krug herself who created BBW: "On rare occasion, we have situations where a piece of material is not what it appears to be on the surface and the material is totally inappropriate for a school library. In that case, yes, it is appropriate to remove materials. If it doesn’t fit your material selection policy, get it out of there." See "Marking 25 Years of Banned Books Week," by Judith Krug, Curriculum Review, 46:1, Sep. 2006.
"Totally different." "Get it out of there." These are the words of major figures in the library world—not mine. Wouldn’t it be nice if the ALA would address the serious issues in a serious fashion? Simple honesty would go a long way toward that goal. Without honesty, the ALA leaves itself exposed to legitimate criticism, such as expressed by Thomas Sowell in "National Hogwash Week."
I understand it is easy to attack the messenger for saying this, but it doesn’t solve the ALA’s dishonesty problem. Oh how I wish the ALA would respect the words I quoted of Jessamyn West or Judith Krug. No. Instead it publishes "Book Banning Alive and Well in the U.S." What an embarrassment.
If any media are reading this, feel free to contact me so that I may provide balance to the false "book banning alive and well" claims.
National Hogwash Week
Thomas Sowell is right on target.
You're wrong
Books are being pulled from libraries, this counts as book banning. Therefore books are being banned in america.
It does qualify as book
It does qualify as book banning if the library removes it from the shelf. Just because it is still available for purchase does not mean it is accessible to everyone. Not everyone can afford to buy books. I do not feel that I have the right to decide what others (with exception of my own children) should or should not be able to read. By the same token, no one else has the right to decide what is appropriate for me or my children to read. School libraries are a touchy subject but our school librarian does restrict certain areas by grade level (which drives my son crazy because the books in his grade level are below his reading level), a practice I am sure other school librarians follow. However, if you are truly concerned about what your child is reading, then you should take a look at their books.
...because it is.
I find it odd that with books being challenged and removed, and groups springing up more regularly telling me what I can and can’t read as well as what my children can and can’t read, that you are saying book banning have not happened in the past 50 years.
As for the quotes you’ve pulled, book banning isn’t just a school library thing. It happens, and is happening more often than it should.
As for why it’s called Banned Books Week:
"One, ALA does not “own” the name Banned Books Week, but is just one of several cosponsors of BBW; therefore, ALA cannot change the name without all the cosponsors agreeing to a change. Two, none want to do so, primarily because a challenge is an attempt to ban or restrict materials, based upon the objections of a person or group. A successful challenge would result in materials being banned or restricted."
(From the ALA site)
As to Ms. West’s quote - there are still many books that parents want taken out of the library because they do not feel it is appropriate for any child. And with that, I have a problem. And that is banning a book.
Anonymous was me
"Anonymous on Tue, 09/21/2010 - 16:29" was me, Dan, of SafeLibraries. I do not know why it is not reporting my name/affiliation.
Banned book week
What is a safe library?
BBW absurdity
So, why not provide elementary schools with subscriptions to Playboy magazine? If no books are ever to be censored, by what logic do schools dare to limit access to pornography for third graders? (Censorship is always wrong, … except for when it is obviously necessary?) There is something absurd about the ALA grandstanding. Parents are portrayed as “evil” when they object to the things that their children are exposed to by clueless bureaucrats. Some of those ALA harpies actually think that there is nothing wrong with exposing little children to pornography. How foolish.