Clarivate to Acquire ProQuest

On May 17, research information company Clarivate announced it will acquire ProQuest for $5.3 billion—the largest transaction in the library sector to date.

The acquisition means a change of ownership for ProQuest but will not substantially affect the products and services purchased by libraries since Clarivate’s products and services do not typically compete in the library market. As part of Clarivate, ProQuest and its technology businesses Ex Libris and Innovative Interfaces potentially gain access to resources that will strengthen its capacity in product development and support. Acquisition documents state that the companies expect to save $100 million in annual operational costs by streamlining facilities, technology infrastructure, and personnel.

The deal is anticipated to close in the third quarter of 2021. In the interim, both businesses must operate with no internal collaboration, as defined by US regulations applicable to public companies.

The acquisition price will be split between $4 billion in cash and $1.3 billion in Clarivate stock, representing about a 7% ownership stake. ProQuest is currently owned by investment firms Cambridge Information Group and Atairos.

Expanding workflow and analytics

Clarivate falls within a category of businesses that provide tools for workflows and analytics for scholarly research. Its peers include Digital Science, as well as Elsevier and other companies that started primarily as scholarly publishers and shifted their emphasis to workflow and analytics.

Academic libraries play an important role in the scientific research cycle and are increasingly interested in being involved in earlier stages of research, such as offering services that can strengthen institutional research capacity. These services, tools, and technologies have traditionally been acquired through an institution’s office of research. Clarivate’s ownership potentially enables academic libraries to gain a stronger position in institutional research.

Clarivate and ProQuest’s combined products could help institutions at every stage of the scientific research process, from the initial funding phase to final outputs (in the form of scholarly papers) to academic libraries using that content to inform new research. A key part of the value proposition of this deal involves assembling a more comprehensive set of tools for scientific research that benefits research organizations and their libraries.

Perspective and predictions

In contrast with other takeovers and contraction seen in the library technology industry in recent years, Clarivate’s acquisition of ProQuest will not mean less competition, as the two companies offer complementary products. When direct competitors within a product segment merge, consumer choices narrow. (Though, products tend to persist in the library field, even when vendors consolidate.) With no directly competing products, this deal will likely not eliminate options on either the content or technology fronts, and therefore is not expected to be perceived as anticompetitive—unlike Ex Libris’s recent acquisition of Innovative Interfaces, which triggered a review by the Federal Trade Commission.

On the library technology front, becoming part of Clarivate is consistent with ProQuest’s product strategies. Ex Libris, for example, has followed a trend of continually extending the reach of its software solutions. Its Alma library services platform supports the management of resources within the library, with Primo providing access to patrons. In recent years, Ex Libris has launched additional products that continue this expansion, such as Leganto (which integrates library materials for classroom use) and Esploro (which provides services in support of research activities and outputs). Ex Libris describes its technology scope as cloud-based solutions for higher education. As part of Clarivate, these cloud services seem positioned for further reach into the scholarly communications infrastructure and will be able to benefit from data and services within the Clarivate product portfolio.

Becoming part of a business based on workflow and analytics brings implications for ProQuest and its library customers. Data and analytics wield great power to inform and optimize business processes. Such power must be harnessed within the bounds of professional values and privacy policies. These values and policies may not always be consistent among the commercial sector, educational institutions, and the library community. Beyond this business change, the role of analytics continues to be an important conversation in the library and education sphere.

For more information, including a visualization of Clarivate’s business history, visit Library Technology Guides.

Latest Library Links

6h

Renaud Foucart writes: “The US Department of Justice may be on the verge of seeking a breakup of Google in a bid to make it less dominant. While this is still a distant prospect, it is being considered in the wake of a series of rulings in the US and the European Union which suggest that regulators are becoming increasingly frustrated by the power of big tech. But what would a breakup of these tech giants achieve for consumers?”

LLRX, Oct. 29
9h

Steven Mintz writes: “For decades, a college or university’s quality was measured by the size of its library collection. The library was the campus’s crown jewel, a towering building at the institution’s center, symbolizing academic prestige. But as collections shift online and physical books move into remote storage, the library’s purpose is now in question. For libraries to maintain their central place within the intellectual life of universities, they must become dynamic, multipurpose hubs that not only provide access to a vast array of digital and physical resources but also actively engage in the broader educational and cultural missions of their institutions.”

Inside Higher Ed: Higher Ed Gamma, Oct. 28
11h

On November 6, ALA issued a statement following the results of the 2024 US election. The full statement reads as follows: “In response to results of the 2024 US election, ALA vowed to continue its defense of the core values of librarianship in the face of political threats. ‘We know that many of our members are concerned that the election results portend attacks on libraries, library workers, and readers,’ said ALA President Cindy Hohl. ‘Whatever happens, ALA will stand up for all Americans’ freedom to read—and we will need everyone who loves libraries to stand with us.’”

AL: The Scoop, Nov. 6
1d

“Over 1.2 million school-aged children were identified as experiencing homelessness during the 2021–2022 school year. Kids who are experiencing homelessness and their caregivers can benefit greatly from the services libraries offer, including computer and printing access, programs and classes, books and other materials, and a place to spend time when their housing situation may not be safe or comfortable. Every school district in the US is required by federal law to have a homeless student liaison, usually called a McKinney-Vento liaison. The good news is that it’s usually pretty easy to find your McKinney-Vento liaison.”

ALSC Blog, Nov. 2
1d

“As early as 2003, certain university libraries in the US developed virtual libraries in the online video game Second Life and offered a variety of services, marking the first practical research on metaverse libraries. The metaverse is regaining popularity nearly two decades later, and technological circumstances have improved. Today’s metaverse is a collection of new technologies, including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), gaming, networking, etc. VR and AR are two of the most important metaverse enabling technologies, and their use in university libraries is growing.”

College & Research Libraries, Nov.
1d

Christina Caron writes: “On social media, Mychal Threets was spreading the gospel of ‘library joy’ to hundreds of thousands of followers. But at his job, as a supervisor at the Fairfield Civic Center Library in Solano County, California, he was facing new challenges. Over a year, Threets filed more than 170 incident reports documenting how library patrons had acted out: property damage, harassment, physical altercations. Like Threets, librarians around the country are struggling to reconcile their desire to serve their communities with their need for self-preservation.”

New York Times, Oct. 31
2d

Megan Bennett writes: “‘Stop the Draft!’ ‘I Like Ike.’ ‘I’m with Her.’ From the iconic to the incendiary, political messages like these have emblazoned buttons and pins since the start of US elections. Since 2012, Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government in Cambridge, Massachusetts, has been archiving political buttons. The collection now spans thousands of items over a century’s worth of campaigns and causes. The collection has approximately 4,800 buttons and pins and 200 stickers. Most fit into one of three categories: campaigns (local and national), sociopolitical movements, and community organizations like unions.”

American Libraries column, Nov./Dec.