Librarians Weigh Kindle Ebook Lending against Reader Privacy



Printer-friendly versionPrint

The library world was thrilled at the September 21 announcement that library vendor OverDrive had enabled its library customers to loan the ebooks they’d licensed from OverDrive to patrons with Kindle e-readers—provided that the ebooks were in Kindle-maker Amazon’s sales inventory. Since then, examination of the fine print between OverDrive and Amazon has caused ethical concerns to be raised in several arenas of library punditry, as American Libraries E-Content blogger Christopher Harris has summarized. Among those concerns is a perceived incursion on patron confidentiality because Kindle ebook borrowers must sync their e-readers to their Amazon accounts in order to receive the borrowed item.

With the October 2 enactment of California’s Reader Privacy Act, confidentiality seemed to gain an additional toehold. Backed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Reader Privacy Act extends, as of January 1, 2012, the confidentiality afforded to library patron’s reading records into the for-profit world of booksellers. It specifically prohibits (PDF file) a commercial provider of a book service “from disclosing, or being compelled to disclose, any personal information relating to a user of the book service [unless] a court order has been issued.” Fines of $500 are mandated for every unauthorized release of a book customer’s personally identifiable information to a third party.

Librarian in Black blogger Sarah Houghton believes (YouTube video, includes language NSFW) that the Reader Privacy Act might even make it illegal for California libraries to loan Kindle ebooks through OverDrive. “I’m fairly certain it’s a fairly gray area that Amazon and OverDrive are in because Amazon is keeping data on what our customers are borrowing and they’re not really supposed to,” she said. “So, according to this bill, [a California library] might be violating state law simply by putting information out there to people in a format that works with their Kindle.” Emphasizing that patrons are redirected to Amazon in order to download the ebook they are borrowing, Houghton noted, “Many libraries have a rule that we cannot endorse companies or promote a particular product or service. And with one fell swoop, many of us are doing that through this Kindle lending program that we have through OverDrive.”

In an October 4 post to the OverDrive blog, Lead Library Advocate Lindsey Levinsohn offered reassurances that the firm “does not collect or maintain any personal information” about visitors to its library clients’ websites. However, Levinsohn continued, the third-party applications and fulfillment services with which OverDrive contracts “may require visitors to register using an email address.” Emphasizing that “the visitor’s name, address and other identifying information are not required,” Levinsohn suggested, “Registration can be accomplished anonymously (e.g. using a valid email address that does not require other identifiable information). Patrons who wish to read on Kindle, for example, may find it convenient to use their existing Amazon account information, but it is not required.”

Commenter Ben Steinberg disagreed: “Although it’s possible to create an email address and Amazon account solely for the purpose of using Overdrive ebooks on the Kindle or a Kindle app, it doesn’t constitute anonymity: if you already own a Kindle, Amazon knows who you are.”

Comments

Language

I watched the video link from my library computer and was not happy when the swearing started. Personally, I don’t care but please let us know when links contain audible swearing because that doesn’t go down well at work, especially in an office that is open to where the public may hear.

re: Language

Point taken.  I’ve appended an NSFW warning after the YouTube URL.

Disclose to patrons, and let them decide?

Can transparency be the answer here? A library could disclose to its users that by accessing a Kindle book through Overdrive, they are potentially sharing their private information with Amazon. Patrons who are not deterred by such information gathering activities on the part of Amazon can proceed on with the service. Patrons who demur are at least not worse off than before the Overdrive/Amazon service became available.

Amazon Overdrive Privacy

I completely agree with Anonymous. In fact I normally find Anonymous to be one of the smarter commenter’s in most arenas. I recognize that this is a serious issue but I really do agree that transparency is the solution. I am an MLS who works for an ILS vendor and we offer libraries the option for patrons to save and access,their reading history. This is a multi-step process

1) Does the library wish to offer this service yes or no

2) if No then that is that no reading history is kept.

3) if yes then each patron can decide if they wish to retain there reading history. If they do they are warned about possible government action i.e. the FBI can get your reading history without you knowing it.

I am in libraries all the time and they seem to agree that patrons care more about getting their needs met i.e. did I read this John Irving book yet, then they do about there privacy.

Transparency, it works.

Amazon and privacy

I was reading that Amazon (via its IMDB subsidiary) has already improperly used private information - http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/8299719-421/actress-sues-imdb-for-….

Books people buy, either in print or as an e-book, are sometimes different from those they’ll borrow for the simple fact that libraries have historically respected confidentiality. This Overdrive/Amazon deal not only prevents people who have Nooks, Kobos, Sony Readers, etc. from using those products, it also is ripe for abuse on Amazon’s end (and Overdrive’s comments don’t inspire confidence).

OverDrive, Amazon, and patron privacy

If we work very hard at it, we can protect our Kindle owning patrons from Amazon so well, that they will gratefully never borrow OverDrive eBooks through us again. They may even avoid us altogether, as a further expression of their gratitude.

If it is a problem to connect users to Amazon to pick up their Kindle eBook, is it a problem to connect them to Adobe to get their Adobe ID and authorize their PC with Adobe Digital Editions? Is it a problem to redirect them from our online catalog to the OverDrive site to get their eBooks in the first place?

Good point, Al. This isn’t a

Good point, Al. This isn’t a “Kindle-specific” issue.

More importantly, if I want to read a book that I don’t want Amazon to know I’m reading, I won’t a) buy it from Amazon or b) download it to my Kindle via my library or directly from Amazon. It’s that simple. No, really, it is.

Sometimes libraries get so caught up in the details they miss the big picture. I fully support patron confidentiality, but at some point it’s also the patron’s responsibility to protect their confidentiality as they deem appropriate. I personally have no problem with Amazon knowing what books I’m downloading from my library on my Kindle. I actually think that information may benefit me and the e-book community as a whole in driving the market for books formatted for the Kindle. It’s beyond my comprehension that anyone who owns a Kindle doesn’t get it that Amazon “knows” what you’re reading.

In a society where free

In a society where free access to information is tied so closely with freedom of speech is it appropriate for libraries to endorse services that come with the condition that reading habits can be tracked and recorded? Why do I have relinquish my privacy in exchange for access to material that is provided for the public good? In other words, information is only available to those who are willing to be tracked and profiled. Doesn’t sound very free to me.