Internet Policy Task Force Notes Library Copyright Concerns

By Carrie Russell | February 5, 2016

The Department of Commerce’s Internet Policy Task Force released its “White Paper on Remixes, First Sale, and Statutory Damages” on January 28 with somewhat promising information for the library community.

The task force consists of Commerce representatives from the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the Patent and Trademark Office, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the International Trade Administration. Formed in 2010 to “conduct a comprehensive review of the nexus between privacy policy, copyright, global free flow of information, cybersecurity, and innovation in the internet economy,” the task force published a comprehensive green paper, “Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy,” in 2013.

Turning to three specific issues in the report, the task force called for comments and convened a number of meetings and round tables with stakeholders on

the legal framework for the creation of remixes
the relevance and scope of the first-sale doctrine in the digital environment
the appropriate calibration of statutory damages in the contexts of individual file sharers and secondary liability for large-scale infringement

US libraries were represented by the Library Copyright Alliance (LCA) at these meetings. Our written comments can be found here and here.

Putting aside the issue of remixes, the task force made two recommendations worth noting.

First, the good news. The task force recommended that the Copyright Act of 1976 be amended to provide more guidance to courts and juries when calculating statutory damages in infringement cases. Currently statutory damages for copyright infringement can range from $750 to $150,000 per work infringed, which is disproportionate with other statutory award frameworks. When libraries are confronted with a “cease and desist” letter for alleged copyright infringement and are threatened with legal action, demanding that a fine be paid for an alleged infringement, the library generally coughs up the money for fear of costs and penalties in a court proceeding. Moreover, the statutory framework has been inconsistently applied, with damages running the full range of amounts for very similar cases.

LCA, along with many others, has lobbied for a review of copyright statutory damage framework for several years, so it is promising that the task force realized this was a problem. Whether Congress will act on this recommendation, time will tell.

Second, the task force recommended that extending first sale to digital transmissions (digital first sale) is not warranted because of potential market harm, which is not surprising. However, LCA was able to make some points about ebook business models that the task force took seriously. LCA referred to the ALA Digital Content Working Group’s matrix “Big Five Publishers and Library Lending.” The task force commented in the white paper that if it “becomes apparent that libraries have been unable to appropriately serve their patrons due to overly restrictive terms imposed by publishers, further action may be advisable” (page 61). It further recommended that libraries and publishers work together to find common ground.

The US House of Representatives Subcommittee on the Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet (part of the Judiciary Committee) as well as the US Copyright Office also are conducting ongoing copyright reviews. For more information on these efforts, see the LCA.

CARRIE RUSSELL is the director of the Program on Public Access to Information in the ALA’s Office for Information Technology Policy.

Tagged Under

Latest Library Links

3h

Katie Gaddini writes: “Book bans may have mushroomed in the Trump era of reactionary politics, but they have a well-established history in America. One woman in particular, Norma Gabler, redefined the current strategy and logic behind modern book bans. Called ‘education’s public enemy number one,’ by critics in 1980, Gabler led the crusade against the so-called secular trend in school textbooks throughout the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Even though Norma and her husband Mel worked together, Norma was the public face of their efforts for decades.”

Time: Made By History, Nov. 13
7h

Many members know Bill Ladewski as executive director of the Reference and User Services Association, an ALA position he has held since 2019. In early September, Ladewski added another title to his CV: director of Member Relations and Services. In this role, he and his team are charged with providing service and information to the Association’s nearly 50,000 members. Ladewski answered our 11 Questions to reintroduce himself to the ALA community.

AL: The Scoop, Nov. 19
1d

John Warner writes: “I understand what people mean when they invoke the term ‘institutional neutrality,’ but I don’t know how it’s workable in today’s world. Higher education institutions are built upon a foundation of actual values, values that are, by definition, not neutral. The Kalven report, the Rosetta Stone of institutional neutrality produced by a faculty committee at the University of Chicago in 1967, is not a call to make all work emanating from an institution ‘neutral,’ but is instead a call to make the atmosphere for scholarly inquiry and debate as free as possible.”

Inside Higher Ed, Nov. 15
1d

Angela Hursh writes: “Ever wondered how your library’s email performance compares to others? Benchmarks help you understand how well your emails perform in key areas and identify opportunities for improvement. They also allow you to compare your email marketing performance, set goals, and stay on top of trends. However, the lack of industry benchmarks for email marketing metrics specific to libraries has been bugging me. Metrics from similar industries don’t fully capture the unique aspects of promoting a library. To help libraries accurately measure their email effectiveness, we’ve created the first-ever library email benchmark report.”

NoveList, Oct. 22
2d

Rachel Hendrick writes: “Students and library vendors are pushing artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in higher education, but there are very few resources that help librarians and scholars separate the wheat from the chaff. Luckily, we here at Choice love a good assessment rubric. (In fact, we made a PDF of our assessment rubric.) Even the least tech-savvy of us can use a very simple AI literacy framework to think critically about whether an AI application is worth your time.”

Choice 360 LibTech Insights, Nov. 13
2d

Rowana Miller writes: “In my experience, many young library-goers identify as storytellers but not writers. These are the kids who draw Captain-Underpants-style cartoons, who craft meticulous Minecraft universes, and who plot elaborate Dungeons and Dragons campaigns, but who believe that ‘writing’ is limited to five-paragraph essays. But when children draw the connections between their natural storytelling proclivities and the written word, they can become self-motivated to develop the communication skills that will help them for the rest of their lives. Libraries, I believe, are uniquely positioned to help children make this connection.”

ALSC Blog, Nov. 15
3d

ALA has reopened its search for an executive director in partnership with executive search firm Isaacson, Miller. A committee of ALA member leaders will oversee the search. The selected candidate will succeed Interim Executive Director Leslie Burger, who was appointed in November 2023. “We are excited to embark on our search for a new executive director,” said ALA President Cindy Hohl. “This leadership position is critical as we navigate the years ahead. We seek candidates who have knowledge of the library community and the urgent issues we face.”

ALA Communications, Marketing, and Media Relations Office, Nov. 14

View more Latest Library Links

Internet Policy Task Force Notes Library Copyright Concerns

Share

Tagged Under