From Preserving Materials to Facilitating Access

Examining participation in the Print Archive Network

By Erika L. Jenns | June 26, 2015

This Friday session—really three sessions rolled into one—examined and encouraged participation in the Print Archive Network (PAN) through an open forum and two panels.

At the forum, the Center for Research Libraries’ Director of Technical Services Amy Wood delivered a recap of a meeting convened by CRL at the University of California, Berkeley, the day before. At that meeting, representatives from large print serials archiving programs examined data collected on various programs and assessed the progress that has been made.

Thomas Teper, assistant university librarian for collections at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, spoke on the role of the HathiTrust Print Monographs Archive Planning Task Force that he chairs. The task force was established in 2011 with a charge to develop plans for a Distributed Print Monographs Archive, a monograph archive that mirrors actual monographic holdings, that is governed and managed by the Trust, and that is lightweight and lowers barriers for early participation. Issues the task force is working to address include exploring the model for identifying and preserving print resources, the necessary qualifications for participating repositories, and analyzing appropriate content for inclusion in the archive.

The first panel included Tom Delaney of RapidILL; Dennis Massie of OCLC; and Stephen Spohn of Massachusetts Library System. Delaney discussed the importance of making information in archives available to users, as “the information contained within the archive is priceless.” Massie shared the results of a study he conducted, focusing on the Ivies Plus group of libraries, which examined collection-sharing trends in three broad strokes. The study found that total sharing activity is going up, and due to circ-to-circ or consortial borrowing. Additional growth has come from the four institutions that joined the group most recently. Finally, Spohn discussed resource-sharing programs in the Massachusetts Library System, and specifically, the Commonwealth eBook Collections.

The concluding panel featured Judith Russell, dean of libraries at the University of Florida; Jamie Wittenberg of the University of Illinois; and Katie Birch, Portfolio Director for Delivery Services at OCLC. Russell discussed a software tool, Journal Retention and Needs Listing (JRNL), developed at the University of Florida and meant to build collections and engage users. So far, 762 agricultural titles have been entered into JRNL. Twelve land grant universities in the Association of Southeastern Research Libraries and the National Agricultural Library are collaborating to establish archiving commitments. Wittenberg introduced a new tool, the Preservation Self Assessment Program, meant to improve the health of analog print assets by providing a standard assessment tool that allows institutions to select copies for inclusion in PAN that are in the best condition. Birch concluded the panel with a discussion on moving away from second symbol methodology to a strategy that allows us to move forward on retention commitments for local libraries by using a standardized format to register commitments more easily.

For more information, visit the Center for Research Libraries’ event site.

ERIKA JENNS recently graduated from Indiana University with her dual MA/MLS. Her MA is in English, and her MLS is accompanied by the Rare Books and Manuscripts Librarianship Specialization.

Tagged Under

#alaac15

17h

Katie Gaddini writes: “Book bans may have mushroomed in the Trump era of reactionary politics, but they have a well-established history in America. One woman in particular, Norma Gabler, redefined the current strategy and logic behind modern book bans. Called ‘education’s public enemy number one,’ by critics in 1980, Gabler led the crusade against the so-called secular trend in school textbooks throughout the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Even though Norma and her husband Mel worked together, Norma was the public face of their efforts for decades.”

Time: Made By History, Nov. 13
21h

Many members know Bill Ladewski as executive director of the Reference and User Services Association, an ALA position he has held since 2019. In early September, Ladewski added another title to his CV: director of Member Relations and Services. In this role, he and his team are charged with providing service and information to the Association’s nearly 50,000 members. Ladewski answered our 11 Questions to reintroduce himself to the ALA community.

AL: The Scoop, Nov. 19
2d

John Warner writes: “I understand what people mean when they invoke the term ‘institutional neutrality,’ but I don’t know how it’s workable in today’s world. Higher education institutions are built upon a foundation of actual values, values that are, by definition, not neutral. The Kalven report, the Rosetta Stone of institutional neutrality produced by a faculty committee at the University of Chicago in 1967, is not a call to make all work emanating from an institution ‘neutral,’ but is instead a call to make the atmosphere for scholarly inquiry and debate as free as possible.”

Inside Higher Ed, Nov. 15
2d

Angela Hursh writes: “Ever wondered how your library’s email performance compares to others? Benchmarks help you understand how well your emails perform in key areas and identify opportunities for improvement. They also allow you to compare your email marketing performance, set goals, and stay on top of trends. However, the lack of industry benchmarks for email marketing metrics specific to libraries has been bugging me. Metrics from similar industries don’t fully capture the unique aspects of promoting a library. To help libraries accurately measure their email effectiveness, we’ve created the first-ever library email benchmark report.”

NoveList, Oct. 22
3d

Rachel Hendrick writes: “Students and library vendors are pushing artificial intelligence (AI) adoption in higher education, but there are very few resources that help librarians and scholars separate the wheat from the chaff. Luckily, we here at Choice love a good assessment rubric. (In fact, we made a PDF of our assessment rubric.) Even the least tech-savvy of us can use a very simple AI literacy framework to think critically about whether an AI application is worth your time.”

Choice 360 LibTech Insights, Nov. 13
3d

Rowana Miller writes: “In my experience, many young library-goers identify as storytellers but not writers. These are the kids who draw Captain-Underpants-style cartoons, who craft meticulous Minecraft universes, and who plot elaborate Dungeons and Dragons campaigns, but who believe that ‘writing’ is limited to five-paragraph essays. But when children draw the connections between their natural storytelling proclivities and the written word, they can become self-motivated to develop the communication skills that will help them for the rest of their lives. Libraries, I believe, are uniquely positioned to help children make this connection.”

ALSC Blog, Nov. 15
4d

ALA has reopened its search for an executive director in partnership with executive search firm Isaacson, Miller. A committee of ALA member leaders will oversee the search. The selected candidate will succeed Interim Executive Director Leslie Burger, who was appointed in November 2023. “We are excited to embark on our search for a new executive director,” said ALA President Cindy Hohl. “This leadership position is critical as we navigate the years ahead. We seek candidates who have knowledge of the library community and the urgent issues we face.”

ALA Communications, Marketing, and Media Relations Office, Nov. 14